Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Topik dan Bahasan meliputi Teknologi Proses dan Inovasi Industri, serta memiliki lingkup pada :

  • Teknologi proses pengolahan atau manufactur
  • Inovasi hasil produk industri
  • Teknologi proses dan otomasi pengolahan limbah industri
  • Pengembangan teknologi pengujian produk dan limbah industri
  • Otomasi dan kontrol proses produksi
  • Inovasi dan proses material terbarukan
  • Pengembangan sistem manajemen mutu industri
  • Sistem informasi untuk operasional industri

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

  • Mendapat tugas dari editor untuk menelaah karya tulis dan menyampaikan hasil penelaahan kepada editor, sebagai bahan penentuan kelayakan suatu karya tulis untuk diterbitkan
  • Menelaah karya tulis secara tepat waktu sesuai gaya selingkung yang ditetapkan dalam pedoman penulisan jurnal dan berdasarkan kaidah ilmiah (metode pengumpulan data, legalitas pengarang, kesimpulan, dll.)
  • Menelaah kembali karya tulis yang telah diperbaiki sesuai dengan standar yang telah ditentukan
  • Mendorong pengarang untuk melakukan perbaikan karya tulis dengan memberikan kritik, saran, masukan, dan rekomendasi
  • Reviewer harus memberikan penilaian yang jujur dan konstruktif dari nilai naskah
  • Penilaian dapat mencakup analisis kekuatan dan kelemahan dari penelitian; saran tentang cara untuk membuat naskah lebih sempurna, relevan, dan mudah dipahami oleh pembaca
  • Menjaga privasi pengarang dengan tidak menyebarluaskan hasil koreksi, saran, dan rekomendasi
  • Penelaah tidak boleh melakukan telaah atas karya tulis yang melibatkan dirinya, baik secara langsung maupun tidak

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Teknologi Proses dan Inovasi Industri (JTPII) diterbitkan dua kali dalam satu tahun, yaitu pada Bulan Juni dan November

 

Open Access Policy

Jurnal Teknologi Proses dan Inovasi Industri (JTPII) menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke isi jurnal dengan maksud membuat hasil penelitian tersedia secara bebas kepada masyarakat untuk mendukung pertukaran ilmu pengetahuan secara global.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Sekilas Mengenai Jurnal Teknologi Proses dan Inovasi Industri (JTPII)

Jurnal Teknologi Proses dan Inovasi Industri (JTPII) merupakan sarana bagi para peneliti, perekayasa dan akademisi dalam menjembatani antara kajian teoritis dan penerapannya untuk  pengembangan industri, khususnya bidang teknologi proses dan inovasi hasil produk.  JTPII  terbit dua kali dalam satu tahun, bulan Juni dan November. Redaksi menerima penulisan artikel karya tulis ilmiah hasil penelitian dan pengembangan (Litbang) atau artikel tinjauan.

 

Etika Publikasi

The publication of an article in JTPII (JURNAL TEKNOLOGI PROSES DAN INOVASI INDUSTRI)  requires agreement on standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editors, the reviewers and the publisher. Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication decisions

The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to should be accepted and published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the scientific panel and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted paper to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted paper must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers:
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors:
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Ethical Statement and Copyright Agreement

Ethical Statement must be submitted as a part of author's initial article submission. The Copyright Agreement must be submitted before the article can be published 

 

 

Plagiarism Check

Seluruh naskah akan dilakukan pengecekan plagiarisme pada saat naskah diterima dan revisi terakhir. JTPII menggunakan Crossref Similarity Check Powered by iThenticate dan Grammarly Plagiarism Checker sebagai software untuk pengecekan kemungkinan adanya plagiat pada naskah. naskah dengan tingkat similarity check lebih dari 20% akan ditolak.